Home My Town & I Embattled Deputy Speaker Seeks Transfer Of Suit from Ondo Chief Judge 

Embattled Deputy Speaker Seeks Transfer Of Suit from Ondo Chief Judge 

By Temitope Adedeji, Akure
Embattled Deputy Speaker of the Ondo State House of Assembly, Hon. Iroju Ogundeji has asked the Chief Judge of the state, Justice William Akintoroye to withdraw from the impeachment proceedings pending before his court.
Ogundeji, who is challenging his impeachment before the court accused the Chief Judge of bias and prejudice against him.
He also said he was not comfortable with the fraternisation between the defendants and the Chief Judge.
In a petition submitted to the Chief Registrar of the court on Monday, Ogundeji said the elevation of Justice Akintoroye to the position of Chief Judge would not enable him to dispense with the case which is time-bound.
Pointedly, Ogundeji said the recent elevation and appointment of Justice Akintoroye as the Chief Judge would preoccupy him with a lot of administrative duties which will definitely hamper the speedy prosecution of the case.
According to him, the case that was filed in the court since December, 2020 has not proceeded to hearing 11 months after.
His words: “Your Lordship expressly praised the speaker of the Ondo State House of Assembly and his estranged deputy during your Lordship’s confirmation on Tuesday, 28th of September, 2021. The position that is in contention before your Lordship.
“Your Lordship expressly mentioned that the House was stable in recent times because of the harmony between the speaker and the disputed Deputy Speaker. The House that divided against itself will never hold.
“Your Lordship proceeded to state that affliction will not rise in the House of Assembly the second time. The express interpretation of this statement is a direct reference to my estranged relationship with the speaker as his deputy, whose unlawful impeachment case is pending before your Lordship.”
Ogundeji said the Speaker, Bamidele Oleyelogun and the Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice who are defendants and counsels in the matter had boasted that the case had been settled in the court.
The embattled lawmaker said the  Registrar announced to lawyers and litigants present in court at the last adjourned date that only part-heard cases in court two would be heard in the present court.
“My case is not part-heard as your Lordship ordered pleadings to be filed and in accordance with the directive of the court, pleadings had just be completed.
“Trial has not commenced. No witness has been called, therefore listing my case to commence hearing in your court clearly suggests interest by the court.
“Consequently, I am not confident that I will get justice from your Lordship’s court, coupled with incessant adjournment since first of December, 2020.
“Your Lordship’s interest is highly suggestive of possible interest, bias and prejudice. The video recording of your Lordship’s statement is available on  request,” he said.
He added that the case should be taken to another judge for impartial adjudication and quick dispensation of justice.

Like and Share this:


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here